You can have the pptp users in a seperate subnet but it won't solve your conflict as you then would still have the lan client in the same subnet and the remote destination you now have to route to still will conflict. You can't add a route to a remote subnet that is identical with your local subnet. I guess you simply need to change your 192.168.0.0/24 to something more uncommon.
 
Holger
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 1:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [pfSense Support] pptp lan address

In the monowall docs on pptp it suggests that you can assign a range of ip addresses to the pptp clients that is not part of the lan ip network range, however if you do this that you can’t route the address range to the wan – is there a way around this – i.e can you put this range into the static routes and add whatever rules are required?

 

(Reason being – historically the lan address range I have inherited is 192.168.0.0/24 which I know is going to conflict with every 2nd xp client user’s home broadband home la nip address range.)

 

TIA

 

Craig

 

 

 

----------------------------------

Craig Silva. IT Manager.

ABX Logistics, Australia.

http://www.abxlogistics.com.au

9 Trade Park Dve. Tullamarine. Vic. 3043

Tel: +61 3 9 335 8250, Mob: 0408408748

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


____________
Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit

Reply via email to