Hi Alastair, bounties always help to move features to the top of the prioritylist tough it's not a guarantee. In case of a WAN failover option we already have talked about it and there are some thoughts about implementing it in 1.1. As we have our second hackathon ( http://pfsense.blogspot.com/2006/07/second-annual-pfsense-hackathon-call.html ) soon it might be a good time to post the bounty now.
Holger -----Original Message----- From: Alastair Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 12:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [pfSense Support] WAN failover - under consideration? Dear Scott (and other developers) As I mentioned the other day, we're very interested in WAN failover capability, and it appears that there are others who would also like this functionality. I'm interested to know whether this feature is under consideration for future releases of pfSense, or how hard it would be to implement. It would seem to be within reach, given the existing WAN load balancing feature. Would this feature be a candidate for a 'bounty'? The company I'm working for is very open to exploring this possibility, and would likely be willing to offer payment in order to accelerate the development of the WAN failover feature. We're purely exploring possibilities here, so I'd be interested in your thoughts. Regards Alastair Stevens SysAdmins Ltd Cambridge, UK ____________ Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
