I run pfsense in Sun Ultra20 -----Mensagem original----- De: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: quinta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2006 13:39 Para: [email protected] Assunto: Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover
Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then you're out of luck, because pfSense is currently not an x64 platform. -Gary Scott Williamson wrote: > Next Question, has anyone had experiences running pfsense on Sun X2100 > Servers? > > Regards > > There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, > and those who cannot. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:56 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load Balancing Failover > > Not only that bridging won't work for CARP it won't work with > policybased routing (as the name already says) and/or loadblalancing > either. How many public IPs do your T1s have? You need at least 3 IPs at > each T1 that you can use to set up CARP correctly. The subnet between > the pfSenses and the ASA shouldn't be the problem. Just use a subnet > that is not used anywhere else in your local network (LAN, DMZ, remote > VPN LANs, ...). Btw, you'll have some problems using 1:1 NAT for this > kind of setup as you can't 1:1 NAT the same IP (of the ASA) to different > WANs (that would be 2:1 what is not possible). You need to go along with > portforwards at WAN and at WAN2 to the ASA. Then the state will handle > which is the right interface to send out the reply. > > Holger > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Scott Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:46 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load >> Balancing Failover >> >> >> 1:1 Nat Accept ALL:ALL? >> >> There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can read binary, >> and those who cannot. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:44 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Bridged Multi-Wan Load >> Balancing Failover >> >> Scott, >> >> Bridging and CARP don't play nicely together, so you're going >> to have to >> >> go another route. >> >> -Gary >> >> Scott Williamson wrote: >> >>> Ok so here is the question, I have 2 Wan Links Sprint 3MB connection >>> >> and >> >>> Verizon 1.5 MB connection. I am wanting to Load Balance across both >>> connections and use a secondary pfsense firewall for failover. The >>> company I work for mad a sizeable investment in 2 Cisco ASA 5520's >>> >> that >> >>> we are throwing into the picture as well. Here is a rough >>> >> diagram of >> >>> what I would like to do: >>> >>> >>> Sprint T1's| |Verizon T1 >>> | | >>> | | >>> PFSENSE Main - Standby PFSENSE >>> | >>> | >>> ASA 5520 - Standby 5520 >>> | | | >>> DMZ LAN DMZ2 >>> >>> >>> I am just wanting to bridge all traffic and the external >>> >> IP's through >> >>> the PFSENSE and allow the ASA 5520's to do the firewalling and VPN. >>> >> Is >> >>> this possible or is there a better soulution? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Scott Williamson >>> >>> >>> There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can >>> >> read binary, >> >>> and those who cannot. >>> >>> >>> DISCLAIMER: >>> >>> This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it >>> >> is addressed >> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this >> e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then >> delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it >> for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person without >> the consent of the sender. Unless expressly stated herein to the >> contrary, only agreements in writing, signed by an authorized >> officer of >> the Company, may be enforced against it. >> >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/406 - Release Date: 2/8/2006 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
