> On 8/24/06, Robert Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 8/24/06, Robert Mortimer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I have 2 ADSL lines each with it's own pfsense box.
> > > >
> > > > I have set up CARP to provide a common LAN address shared
> > > between the two
> > > > boxes
> > > >
> > > > Should this configuration load balance? At the moment the
> traffic graphs
> > > > seem to have all traffic going out of the master address
> until fail over
> > >
> > > CARP load balancing is not supported in 1.0.
> >
> > No problem. Is it in Head or are you looking for volunteers? I'm still
>
> Nope, we removed that functionality because it doesn't work worth a
> damn. I don't expect to see it in the tree again. You might be
> better served with a carp cluster with TWO wans, not a carp cluster
> with one wan on each node.
>
I have two WANS. The carp cluster is across two boxes each with it's own
ADSL connection.
|=PF01===ADSL01===Iternet
|
Carp
|
LAN===|
|
Carp
|
|=PF02===ADSL02===Iternet
Carp is the simple way to balance across this setup. Is there a way to use
the load balancer on the CAP NIC instead. All examples seem to have a 1
box solution
--Rob
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
