We are trying to find out. So do what was suggested, delete all rules and 
reboot. If you still have full access on the openvpn interface it might be a 
bug or a limitation (which I can't say for sure right now).

Holger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyle Mott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:09 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] OpenVPN Clients and FW ACL's
> 
> 
> That's not an option. Rules are rules, and it should be blocking the 
> traffic. All of my other rules on other interfaces work as expected.
> 
> Can someone tell me if this is a bug?
> 
> 
> -Kyle
> 
> Rob Terhaar wrote:
> > How about if you take all the rules out for the openvpn connection, 
> > reboot the system, and see what your firewall does then?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 9/12/06, *Kyle Mott* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > 
> >     I've attached a JPG. Even with that ACL, I can get to 
> RDP on my main
> >     box
> >     on the LAN interface from any OVPN client. I followed 
> the HowTo, but the
> >     HowTo says to leave everything open for testing. After 
> I got done with
> >     testing, I removed the "generic" rules, and tried to 
> only allow access
> >     to specific hosts/ports/protocols, which doesn't seem 
> to be working as I
> >     would expect.
> > 
> > 
> >     -Kyle
> > 
> >     Rob Terhaar wrote:
> >      > Did you follow the howto on the wiki to get openvpn setup?
> >      > what does your firewall ruleset look like for your openvpn
> >     interface on
> >      > the pfsense?
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > On 9/12/06, * Kyle Mott* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
> >      >
> >      >     Hi,
> >      >
> >      >     I'm noticing that no matter what kind of block 
> statements I
> >     put on my
> >      >     LAN or TUN0 interface, my OpenVPN clients can 
> always get to
> >     anything it
> >      >     wants on the LAN interface (and vice versa). Is 
> this normal
> >      >     behaviour? I
> >      >     was hoping to have a bit more granular control over what
> >     clients can
> >      >     access when they are connected. I'm running RC2.
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >     -Kyle
> >      >
> >      >    
> >     
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >      >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >      >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> >      >     For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >      >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> >      >
> >      >
> > 
> > 
> >     
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >     For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to