Ok,

but is there a date when RC3 could be expected? If it's close, then
probably it would be better for me to wait a couple of days than to put
in production the older version.

Thank you,

Roberto


Holger Bauer wrote:
> There have been some hundred codechanges form RC2 to the recent snaps ( see 
> http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/timeline ). RC2 actually is several weeks old now 
> and we are very close to RC3 (RC2 is dated in CVS 1st of august). As we only 
> fix bugs in the releng_1 codetree you can consider every new snapshot more 
> stable or including less bugs then a previous version. If you are 
> encountering problems of some sort you always should try to reproduce them 
> with the latest snapshot as they might be fixed already and why should we 
> look into problems just to find out "ah, that was fixed several weeks ago or 
> was related to a bug that was fixed weeks ago".
>
> Holger 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roberto Greiner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 2:09 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] kernel panic on 1.0RC2
>
>
> Sorry to get into this post, but there is something bugging me here.
>
> I'm about to put into production a new server running the latest version of 
> pfSense available at the page, which is rc2. Now, I'm seeing that if that 
> version gives problems it won't be supported because it's old, and I'm 
> supposed to use a daily snapshot instead?????
>
> Roberto
>
>
> Holger Bauer wrote: 
> Please upgrade to a most recent version: 
> http://pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-26-06/
> We won't check for errors if they are not reported using the latest version. 
> RC2 is quite old.
>
> Holger
>
>   
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Evers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:37 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [pfSense Support] kernel panic on 1.0RC2
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a strange problem on my firewall cluster, when I remove a carp
> address the firewall node locks up (repeatable), the machine is left
> with a panic message on the console, and can only be brought back to
> life with a reboot. After the reboot everything seems fine 
> and the CARP
> address is removed. I have no idea how to debug this so can any of you
> give me pointers ?
>
> Attached is the output of the last dmesg
> The network card where the CARP address was configured is 
> using the ste
> driver and is a 4-port D-link network adapter.
> The machines used are Dell PE2850 single processor HTT enabled.
>
> More information can be provided if necessary.
>
> TIA!
> Rob Evers
>
>   


-- 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
|                     Marcos Roberto Greiner                        | 
|                                                                   | 
|         Os otimistas acham que estamos no melhor dos mundos       | 
|         Os pessimistas tem medo de que isto seja verdade          | 
|                                                     Murphy        | 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
|                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]                           | 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to