This is not possible atm. It's hardcoded in the slbd binary but we are
discussing to either lower sensitivity or make it configurable. I would
prefer configurable to be able to include links with higher delay for
example (like wireless links) or links where provider do some shaping to
give pings low priority.

Holger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelu Sofrone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 2:36 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Carp failover & ISP Load balance
> 
> Thank you for replay.
> 
> My issue with loadbalancing is only from one of ISP and I've 
> tried some different monitor IP with no change. Can I make 
> the loadbalancing test less sensitive by increasing the ping 
> time out or number of pings?
> 
> Nelu
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Holger Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:41 AM
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Carp failover & ISP Load balance
> 
> 
> What you see is caused by unreliable monitor Ips (they don't answer to
> pings all the time). Try to use different monitor IP for your pools.
> Loadbalancing is stable. I'm using it at several locations without
> issues. However with the latest snapshots a new feature 
> (failover pools)
> was added and the pool creation mechanism was changed to make
> configuration easier. This *should* work but is not yet as much in
> detail tested like the 1.0.1 balancing code. I don'T have 
> issues with it
> at our office though where I now run failoverpools and
> loadbalancingpools. I also know there are some installations out there
> using CARP and pools successfully. Make sure your Outbound 
> nat settings
> are correct.
> 
> Holger
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to