While I don't have a answer to your questions specifically, we do have
some of the mibs documented if it will help:

http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=257

Scott


On 1/24/07, Adam Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My current deployment is generating 500mb of rrd files!

I'm sure at some point in the future it would be quite easy to
appliance-ize, though perhaps a pfsense package wouldn't be the correct
place?

If anyone is interested in having a poke at it, I'd be willing to help them
install it. It's not very well documented at the moment, but I could do with
some other people to give suggestions and/or fix things!

Adam.

-----Original Message-----
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 January 2007 14:47
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] pfSense SNMP identification

I don't have an answer to your questions but the screenshots at your
page look promising :-)
You could maybe create a package for pfSense to make it a monitoring
appliance.

Holger



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 3:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [pfSense Support] pfSense SNMP identification
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently writing an NMS
> (http://www.pimpmynetwork.org/observer/) which uses SNMP to
> automatically guess the operating system of hosts and setup
> graphing/monitoring accordingly.
>
> The cut-down SNMP daemon in m0n0/pfsense massively reduces
> the number of things I can monitor on m0n0, and I can't see a
> way to easily identify them via SNMP using version strings or
> similar. I'm currently manually identifying m0n0 boxes in the
> database, which then limits the amount of information the
> application tries to poll/display.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions on how to identify m0n0wall
> and pfSense via SNMP?
>
> Could a simple change be made to allow them to be easily
> identified? (a custom OID for pfSense giving out its version
> would be great!)
>
> Perhaps an identifier and version could be appended to the
> FreeBSD kernel version?
>
> (sorry for cross-posting, and for those of you who've seen
> something very similar on the m0n0 list!)
>
> Thanks,
> Adam.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to