Why do you need static routes? Directly attached interfaces do not need static routes.
On 3/16/07, Sloan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
both are unchecked On 3/16/07, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/16/07, Sloan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can't ping through the WAN interface. > > > > LAN IP 192.168.2.254 > > > > WAN IP 192.168.0.108 > > > > Outside the WAN IF i have a computer 192.168.0.1 > > > > I set up a static route > > > > if = LAN Network = 192.168.0.0/24 gw > > = 192.168.0.1 > > > > > > Firewall rules > > > > WAN > > proto = * source = * port = * Dest = * Port = * gateway = * > > proto = ICMP source = * port = * Dest = * Port = * gateway = * > > > > LAN > > proto = * source = LANnet port = * Dest = * Port = * gateway = * > > > > On the WAN interface I have UN-checked Block Private Networks > > > > I have two more interfaces on this computer/firewall that are deactivated. > > In case this is important > > > > Question: > > > > Do I need to set up firewall rules to activate pfsense? In other words is > > it not set up to work without any rules being set? I keep thinking it is > > like a SOHO router like LINKSYS or NETGEAR. > > > > From the system logs I have a frequent entry > > > > kernel: arplookup 192.168.0.1 failed: host not on local network > > > > But it is plugged in and the 192.168.0.1 computer is up and running. This > > pc (192.168.0.1) cannot ping the pfsense interface 192.168.0.108. > > > > TIA for any suggestions > > > > Is Interfaces -> WAN -> Block private networks checked? What about > block bogon networks? > > If so, try unchecking them. > > Scott > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
