I also have a feeling this has something to do with the MTU.... One NIC is identified as bfeX and the other as fxpX. According to some of the document I read on the Internet, it says that bfeX supports Tagged VLAN on hardware basis whereas fxpX supports tagged VLAN on long frame basis, anyone knows what it meant? Any chance that this is the cause?
Regards, Kelvin -----Original Message----- From: Kelvin Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 2:57 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] VLAN Hi Bill, I suppose I did, unless there are something I was not aware. I created a VLAN on the NIC, and assign the VLAN ID to OPT1 in the interface menu. Regards, Kelvin -----Original Message----- From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 2:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] VLAN On 4/21/07, Kelvin Chiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, I have some issue with implmenting VLAN, can someone help to > comment? > > I have 2 boxes of pfsense. I connected the LAN interfaces of both > boxes with a crossover cable and I defined VLAN 1 (Tag 1) on both LAN > interfaces. From the interfaces, I now have 3 interfaces, WAN, LAN, > and OPT1 on both boxes. The LAN interfaces coommunicate with untagged > packets are working fine. However, the OPT1 interfaces cannot > communicate with each other. > > Some considerations: the NIC for the LAN interface are using different > chipset but pfsense detected both as VLAN-capable NIC. Are you allowing 802.1q frames on your lan interface? --Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
