Scott Ullrich wrote:
Yes, you are correct. Whoever made the default option to check NAT-T support should really consider reverting this. We now build all of the binaries on each image run. Having that as the default does not seem like a sane way of working this considering that someone has to add support to the kernel. I will look at a way to modify our port to ensure it does not include NAT-T support.
Maybe it's better to revisit whatever the issue is with the NAT-T implementation? Seems nobody else has an issue with it, and I've never been told what the real issue was with it, so am not familiar with it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
