As I wrote: OPT1: 192.168.0.200/24, so this is not the lan interface, but the 
OPT1...

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: sai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Inviato: martedì 8 maggio 2007 10.43
A: [email protected]
Oggetto: Re: [pfSense Support] Publishing over 2 WAN connections

172.16.0.2:80 <-> 192.168.0.200:80 <- 192.168.0.36:4196
SYN_SENT:ESTABLISHED.

This is a connection from your LAN not from OPT.

sai

On 5/8/07, Quirino Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I'm dealing again with the task of publishing my servers' services over two
> different internet connections (in conjuncion with load balancing outgoing
> traffic over the same internet connections).
>
>
>
> Now I'll give you more detailed informations.
>
>
>
> My firewall is a pc with pfsense upgraded at the latest version available
> (pfSense-Full-Update-1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-05-02-07).
> It has three interfaces Lan, Wan and Opt1:
>
>
>
> LAN: 172.16.0.1/24
>
> WAN: 217.x.x.202/27 - with gw 217.x.x.193
>
> OPT1: 192.168.0.200/24 - with gw 192.168.0.1
>
>
>
> In my internal network I have a web server with the ip address 172.16.0.2.
>
>
>
> I NAT'ed the port 80 using "Port Forward" on both WAN and OPT1 using the
> address of the internal web server (172.16.0.2).
>
> The strange thing is that if i try  to access my web server from the WAN ip
> address, everything works correctly and I can browse my web pages, but if i
> try to browse the web server using the OPT1 address, both using telnet on
> port 80 and internet explorer, the connection times out. The content of the
> firewall states related to this problem is: 172.16.0.2:80 <-
> 192.168.0.200:80 <- 192.168.0.36:4196 SYN_SENT:ESTABLISHED.
>
>
>
> Furthermore, even if I explicitly deny the ICMP traffic on the OPT1
> interface, it replies to ping requests.
>
>
>
> All the described problems doesn't happen if I remove the gateway from the
> OPT1's interface configuration (but this is needed for policy routing in
> multi wan environments)
>
>
>
> Can you help me?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> r3N0oV4
>
>
>
> P.S.: This is the second post of my question because no one answered to me.
> There's something wrong in it?
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to