Perhaps I'm seeing the issue incorrectly then. I have 2 pf boxes at
different locations. Box A is Class C (192.168.10.0/24), Box B is Class C
(192.168.1.0/24). A and B are connected via an IPSEC VPN tunnel, but Box B
also has a tunnel to another VPN terminator. I want to add a static route to
Box A to get traffic to the VPN terminator via B.
Box A (pf Sense) = 192.168.10.0/24
Connects to (using IPSEC):
Box C (pfSense) = 192.168.1.0/24
Connects to (using IPSEC):
Router C (unknown brand, managed) = 192.168.3.0/24
I need to get traffic from the network behind Box A to Router C and I
thought a static route would be the way, but I don't believe the LAN or WAN
interface is appropriate because the use of IPSEC tunnels. Am I thinking
about this the wrong way?
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 7:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Static Route for IPSEC
The subnet will need to be part of your tunnel definition. There is
no need to add it as a route.
--Bill
On 10/21/07, Michael Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to create a static route that points to a gateway over an IPSEC
> tunnel but there is no "IPSEC" interface (as there is for PPTP). Can this
be
> done? How?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
