So, it would still load Balance/Failover as a router in that case I assume.
Thanks for the information. -- Heath Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- From: Sean Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:08:06 -0400 To: <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Multi Link Router instead of Firewall > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:07:13 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [pfSense Support] Multi Link Router instead of Firewall > > Is it possible to setup a Multi WAN (Failover/Load Balance) configuration > and bypass the Firewall? Basically setting the pf box up as a router and > using another firewall behind the Pf box to act as a filter? > > I noticed an option in the pF interface to do such a thing, but figured I > better check before I get into it too deep. > > Will it still function the same way? > > Thanks > > -- > Heath Henderson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- it will run as a router only if you want it to just fine. only difference is a "Pass all" rule thats generated. Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by today! <http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff2.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_OctW Ltagline>
