Thanks, I have used those documents, only problem is that gateway issue. I
cant seem to separate is and seem to be getting the gateway from one of my
other interface cards. 

What can I check to ensure it has its own gateway ? I have set it up in
interface setup as that way but when I view the interface status is shows
the shared one. 

Regards,
 
 
Mike Lever
 
Tenacity Films (Pty) Ltd t/a
Velocity Films
 
(T) +2711-807-0100
(F) 086-681-7518

http://www.velocityfilms.com
 
 
CONFIDENTIALITY CAUTION: If you have received this communication in error,
please note that it is intended for the addressee only, is privileged and
confidential and dissemination or copying prohibited. Please notify us
immediately by e-mail and return the original message. Thank you.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: RB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 26 Feb 2008 11:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Setting gateways ?

>  In a nutshell I have 3 DSL lines ( currently 1 x PPPoe, 1 static and 1
DHCP)
>
>  What, in your opinion is the best setup ? (I can make all of the above
>  static )
>
>  How do I go about setting up the gateways so I achieve load balancing but
>  that traffic goes through the relevant gateway and not shared ?

The multi-WAN document should cover what you're looking for:

http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi_WAN_/_Load_Balancing

Do note that in 1.2, only one interface can connect via PPPoE; if you
have a choice, it would definitely simplify your setup to make them
all static, or at least DHCP.

If you want specific clients to go through specific circuits, that's a
slightly different setup; you'll want to use source-based routing
(search wiki/mailing list for documentation).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to