On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Angelo Turetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Separate host from pfSense? You mean during build or in the resulting image? > Maybe I'm dumb, but I can't understand why the binaries that compose the > base pfSense image should be installed on a non-standard prefix. > That would be acceptable if we speak about optional packages, so that > upgrades of the base system cannot be messed up by installed ports.
On the builder host, not on pfSense. > And this does not explain why the pfPorts should be missing from the image, > I cannot understand why this would depend on FreeBSD6 I would say your tree is out of date? This does work. We are just missing a few binaries here and there that do not work correctly with PREFIX=. Scott --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
