nothing wrong. just different. it may have side effects, which needs some thinking.
sai On 7/7/08, Ermal Luçi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:47 AM, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I tested this and it looks like this is a side effect of the new shaper. > > > > > What's the wrong side of it? > > Ermal > > > > sai > > > > On 6/19/08, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Is this normal? I just opened my log files and clicked on one of the > >> red icons. I seem to remember that blocked packets only had one > >> associated rule. I get this: > >> > >> <10.10.10.10> > >> > >> The rule that triggered this action is: > >> > >> @2 block drop in log all label "Default deny rule" > >> @20 block drop in on ! rl1 inet from 192.168.10.0/24 to any > >> @21 block drop in inet from 192.168.10.10 to any > >> @22 block drop in on ! rl2 inet from 11.22.33.0/24 to any > >> @23 block drop in inet from 11.22.33.215 to any > >> @24 block drop in on rl0 inet6 from fe80::xx:xx:xx:b767 to any > >> @25 block drop in on rl1 inet6 from fe80::xx:xx:xx:b766 to any > >> @26 block drop in on rl2 inet6 from fe80::xx:xx:xx:b765 to any > >> @27 anchor "spoofing" all > >> @28 anchor "spoofing" all > >> @29 block drop in on vr0 inet6 from fe80::xx:xx:xx:ca70 to any > >> > >> I had Ermals shaper installed and in use but due to isp problems got rid > of it. > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- > Ermal > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
