On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Bryan Derman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Re: There is nothing in your config that requires AON, ... > --- > You're correct. It was "historical*" and I've now > reduced/fixed/tested/deployed the config: > Now: http://www.derman.com/Misc/router/pfSenseReduced.html > Previously: http://www.derman.com/Misc/router/pfSense.html > > However, if one _was_ using AON, are the NAT rules applied in the > top-to-bottom order they are listed via Firewall -> NAT -> Outbound? >
Yes. > Also, note that even with the reduced/auto-NAT configuration, the issues > I described in my posting "Loss of webConfigurator access when disabling > WANs"/2008-07-24 are still present and can be reliably replicated (at > least with my 2 systems). > Can you open a bug ticket at http://cvstrac.pfsense.org with specific steps on replicating the problem? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
