On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list I'm currently migrating our dns server to new binds releases
> due to daminsky vulnerability, but I'm hitting a rock because of the
> disable of edns protocol, to do this test first I disable disable the
> firewall in pfsense and in the os, but still bind is not able to work
> with edns protocol, the guys at isc told me this:
>
> "disabling EDNS" is issued when named experiences too many
> timeouts to EDNS queries and named decides to give up on
> EDNS and revert to plain old DNS.   Now timeouts can be the
> result of many things.  Broken nameservers that don't respond
> to EDNS queries.  Firewalls that block EDNS queries.
> Firewalls that block fragmented responses.  Firewalls/NATs
> that don't handle out of order fragments
>
> So, my question is??
> PFSense handles fragmented responses well???
> PFSense handles out of order fragments well??

Yes and yes. Scrub will reassemble them and pass them on.



> I will send a capture I did on the dmz interface where I can see that
> old plain dns queries works ok, but edns fails with a port unreachable
> when using high udp ports.
> Any ideas??
>

Where is the unreachable coming from? Do you see it on your WAN or
just the inside interface?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to