On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 16:26, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:22 PM, RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Who has put off rolling out pfSense or a similar platform >> because it didn't implement IPv6? > > Anything for the US Government is required to be IPv6 ready. Accepted and reasonable, but did pfSense pass EAL when I wasn't looking? I know not everything has to pass, but you get the idea. For that matter, in the current US marketing environment, pfSense would be considered "IPv6 ready" - the underlying OS has full support even though the UI does not.
> I think you will start to see IPv6 adoption rapidly pick up steam, but > as you indicate, anything that is 2-3 years off still leaves most > people thinking that they have plenty of time. Agreed, but it is my opinion we won't see this until it starts threatening large ISPs' bottom end: when they can't take on any more new customers. Then (and only then) will IPv6 become anything more than an esoteric issue to those holding the purse-strings. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
