Hi Dimitri, Thanks for the clues, i will look at what i can do with the switch.
> Is there a particular reason you are trying to do a captive portal using a > bridge setup vs NAT? We have the right amount of public IP available (only a class C, but for around 150 users, that's plenty enough), so no reason to NAT. I have been running a bridged firewall (FreeBSD + ipf) for ages (since FreeBSD 4.0 maybe), it is working smoothly, it is invisible (obscurity is not security, but it contributes to security), it simplifies routing (one less hop) and in case of problem, it can be replaced with an Ethernet cable. That's among the reasons why I like bridged firewall. Now captive portal is requirement by the country (Thailand) that host our institute. Best regards, Olivier --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
