Tim A. wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
It was always my understanding that pfsense stability came before
features. I don't mind that, because i would rather have a product
that works 100% of the time, without the features i want. Rather then
a product that works 50% of the time, with all the features I want.
Adam
No no, it was my fault for building HEAD. I knew I could be in for
trouble.
I was just disappointed and wanted to understand the drive behind 2.0.
I built RELENG_2_0 and all is so far so good.
The underlying system is mostly the same with some fixes. But this GUI
is AWSOME! So smooth and polished.
I didn't understand what the major change was that justified the major
revision.
2.0 is all about the CoreGUI code. I think they did a clean rewrite.
I think the philosophy still stands, as pfsense has always been very
good at releasing non-buggy software . A lot of software companies think
its perfectly fine to release a product then patch it forever.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
