To be more specific, the other subnets are actually remote offices in an MPLS cloud. No other NAT anywhere. This works fine with a Cisco firewall and does seem to work with PFsense as well.. Just making sure its not something with known issues or frowned upon. Seems like its ok from Chris's firm YES !
thanks for the replies. Matt. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Tim Dickson <[email protected]>wrote: > > From: Matt [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 5:05 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [pfSense Support] Port forward beyond local internal > subnet. > > Hi, > > I have a router behind pfsense with multiple internal subnets behind > that. > Will a pfsense port forward from the WAN to any of my internal > subnets work ? > Assuming pfsense can route to the internal subnets the port > forward should > work fine right ? > > thanks. > > Matt. > ---------------------------------------- > > Most likely it will work – but is not recommended. (Double NATing that is) > And this is assuming the secondary router is routing the packets correctly. > What is the purpose of pfSense in this case? Would using it in bridge mode > work better for you? > Or is there a reason you need the multiple Routers…. How about removing the > secondary Router and programming pfsense for all the subnets? > -tim > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org > >
