Yes you will setup seperate tunnel for each subnet..I also get this error at times but it is fine after restarting racoon....
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Peziol <[email protected]> wrote: > This is what I get on the 1.2.3 side: racoon: *[Unknown Gateway/Dynamic]*: > ERROR: no policy found: 192.168.20.0/24[0] <http://192.168.20.0/24%5B0%5D> > 192.168.4.0/24[0] <http://192.168.4.0/24%5B0%5D> proto=any dir=in > > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Paul Peziol <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How would I set that up.Do I need 2 separate tunnels created or can I use >> 1 tunnel to route both networks. I tried to setup both subnets in the 2.0 >> version to connect to the 1.2.3 (that has 2 subnets) and it would error >> out. >> >> >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Abdulrehman <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Yes you can...Inface I have 3 different subnets on IPsec. >>> >>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Paul Peziol <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I have come across where pfsense 2.0 can support multiple networks over >>>> ipsec. Can I create a tunnel between pfsense 1.2.3rc1 and 2.0beta2. >>>> I have a 192.168.20.0/24 network behind the 2.0 pfsense (Site A) and >>>> behind the 1.2.3 I have 192.168.2.0/24 and 192.168.4.0/24 (Site B). Is >>>> it possible create a tunnel between site A and site B where Site A can >>>> access both networks on SiteB. I created the 2nd Phase2 policy in SiteA but >>>> that never seems to come up. While the 192.168.2.0 networks connects. >>>> >>>> Considering SiteB is a production environment I hesitate to upgrade to a >>>> beta version right now. Site A is not as critical as its a home office >>>> Thank you >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> Abdulrehman >>> >> >> > -- Regards Abdulrehman
