On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Aarno Aukia <aarnoau...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello topher, > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 21:49, Chris Flugstad <ch...@cascadelink.com> wrote: >> I am trying to BGP our core router with our 2 providers and they are asking >> me if i want a Full Internet routing table, a partial routing table, or just >> a default route >> >> any help? >> >> I'm looking at just redundancy and load balancing, but 1 provider is our >> main connection, the 2nd is for backup or when the 1st is bogged down. > > We had full tables on pfsense for almost 2 years, but have now moved > on to custom openbsd routers for that. Since you only want to use the Any reason you switched to OpenBSD?
> second provider as fail-over I'd recommend getting default routes only > and local-pref:ing the first over the second. > > Regards, > Aarno > -- > Aarno Aukia > Atrila GmbH > Switzerland > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com > For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com > > Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org > > -- Ermal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
