On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:16 PM, William Salt
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, thanks for the input.
> We have now swapped the cards to em card at both ends, instead of igb at one
> end, and em at the other. We are now seeing near gig speeds in both
> directions. Before, we saw very different speeds in each direction.
> We have now managed to reach around 860-900mbps each way with the following
> values in our sysctl.conf:
>
> kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=20971520
> net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_max=20971520
> net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max=20971520
> net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_inc=524288
> net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_inc=524288
> However, even though we can reach around the upper threshold of the
> connection, we are seeing the boxes crash, or tcp performance hit the
> miximum 860-900mbps then drop, and stick at around 8mbps, until a reboot.
>
> I might add that we are running 32bit (i386) RC3 at both ends, with 6gb of
> ram.(probably alot less in the OS, need to upgrade to x64)
> When i replicated these settings on two fresh boxes beyong the routers at
> either end, i saw no performance increase...
> Regards
> Will
>

Can you please give the back traces from the cashes?
Also can you gather statistics:
pfctl -vvsa
ifconfig -a
sysctl -a

from the box


> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Eugen Leitl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> ----- Forwarded message from Rhys Rhaven <[email protected]> -----
>>
>> From: Rhys Rhaven <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:30:06 -0500
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Strange TCP connection behavior 2.0 RC2
>> (+3)
>> Organization: Rhaven Industrys
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
>>        rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
>>
>> Obviously not helping if you are trying to tune standard TCP, but I
>> lament that protocols like Tsunami are not in wider use.
>> http://tsunami-udp.sourceforge.net/ Short of it, a TCP control channel
>> takes care of error checking and resends while the data channel is a UDP
>> stream, specifically built to max out LFNs.
>>
>> On 06/28/2011 03:52 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>> > ----- Forwarded message from William Salt <[email protected]>
>> > -----
>> >
>> > From: William Salt <[email protected]>
>> > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:03:25 +0100
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: [pfSense Support] Strange TCP connection behavior 2.0 RC2 (+3)
>> > Reply-To: [email protected]
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> >          For the last couple of months i have been pulling my hair out
>> > trying to solve this problem.
>> > We have a 1Gbps transatlantic link from the UK to the US, which has
>> > successfully passed the RFC2544 test.
>> >
>> > At either end, we have a media converter, and a supermicro server with
>> > an
>> > intel quad port NIC running pfsense 2 (RC2 at one end RC3 at the other)
>> > and
>> > the IGB driver on the quad port.
>> >
>> > We can pass 1gbps either way with UDP. However we are experiencing very
>> > strange issues with tcp connections.
>> >
>> > With window scaling enabled, and a max socket buffer set to 16MB, we see
>> > no
>> > difference.
>> > Even disabling window scaling and setting the window to 16MB makes no
>> > difference.
>> >
>> > Each TCP connection starts very slowly, and will max out at around
>> > 190mbps,
>> > taking nearly 2 minutes to climb to this speed before *plateauing*.
>> >
>> > We have to initiate many (5+) connections to saturate the link with tcp
>> > connections with iperf.
>> >
>> > Real world tests transferring files, max out at 100mbps, using multiple
>> > connections.
>> >
>> > I have followed guides like this:
>> > http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/tcptune/#FreeBSD
>> >
>> > With no luck, and have tweaked, disabled, and enabled nearly every
>> > relevant
>> > sysctl parameter with no luck.
>> >
>> > Can anyone shed some light on this?
>> >
>> > I am now doubting the IGB driver, and am looking to swap out the cards
>> > as a
>> > last ditch effort.
>> > However, we have tried different hardware (L3 switches, media convertes
>> > +
>> > laptops etc), and the symptoms still persist...
>> > The only constant is freebsd 8.1 - pfsense (or 8.2 for our production
>> > systems).
>> > I have tried the freebsd net mailinglist, but im hoping you lot can help
>> > me!
>> >
>> > Cheers in advance
>> > Will
>> >
>> > ----- End forwarded message -----
>>
>>
>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>> --
>> Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
>> 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>>
>
>



-- 
Ermal

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org

Reply via email to