On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:54 AM, mayak-cq <[email protected]> wrote: > hi again, > > i am now wondering why it is necessary to have gateway defined in the > WAN interface ... >
Because that's what determines for NAT purposes whether something is treated as a WAN. > if in the gateway definition, a gateway is flagged as the default, that > should be enough, no? > That's where your Internet traffic that doesn't match policy routing goes. > what appears to be happening is that policy routes as defined in LAN > rules are being overwritten by the gateway as defined in the WAN > interface. > It does not, policy routing rules override the system routing table. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
