On 08/03/2008, Niklas Bolmdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something that you have to get used to if you constantly update your > software is that things change, and not always in a fashion that you > yourself approve of. You also have to learn that it's seldom the first > iteration of a feature that makes it into the software permanently. > Something gets added, changed, altered again and finally (hopefully) it > settles into the software as a natural part of the feature-set. Of > course this cycle depends on user-developer contact, but there's a > difference (that I find myself having a hard time explaining) between > constructive discussion and nagging.
So does it mean that if a new feature annoys me, it's just nagging, right? if I like to see large input field, it's not a constructive feedback, it's just nagging, right? and if I prefer to have a freedom of resizing that input field, is it again just nagging, not a constructive feedback? I do understand reason, why this particular feature was introduced, but in my humble opinion it is a step backward - it cuts functionality, cuts flexibility and cuts user's control over his/hers conversation window. Next step will be to fix size of conversation window :-) Sorry for my non-constructive feedback. -- http://matulka.net/ _______________________________________________ Support mailing list [email protected] http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
