If we assume the logo is "GPLv2 or later" (as with our source code), I don't think it can be used in a CC BY SA 3.0 derivative work. If you want to pursue that, the IM Freedom corporation (which I believe is the copyright holder of the logo) would have to dual-license it.
How do the other developers (and more specifically, the IMF board members) feel about CC BY SA 3.0 for the logo and/or other artwork? Richard
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [email protected] http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
