Hi! Am Montag, den 09.11.2009, 11:28 -0800 schrieb Mark Doliner: > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Johann Glaser <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Am Sonntag, den 08.11.2009, 14:56 -0600 schrieb Richard Laager: > >> On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 21:03 +0100, Johann Glaser wrote: > >> > Is it true that in this case every added contact requires a new > >> > confirmation of "acceptance" by him? > >> > >> I'm not sure. I don't think I've touched that part of the code. You'll > >> just have to look and see, or wait for someone else to jump in with an > >> answer. > > > > Some time ago I tried to add a user which was in the Licq-client-list to > > Pidgin (which used the server list). At this time a new authorization > > request was necessary. I guess the ICQ servers require this > > authorization if you add a user to the server-list. > > Yeah, this will probably result in the ICQ servers asking each buddy > for authorization. I believe the protocol does have some concept of > "importing" a non-server side list of buddies and not asking for > authorization, but Pidgin/libpurple does not support this. It also > may not be documented anywhere. And it may not be possible. > > Is licq capable of using a server-side buddy list? If so, does it > have a way to import your old buddies? If so, that is probably your > best option.
I don't really know. I didn't even notice the transfer from client-side to server-side user list. Somehow it must have imported them. But strangely enough, not all of them. I have lots of old accounts which are not in the server list. Probably these were not active since the transition. Bye Hansi _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list Want to unsubscribe? Use this link: http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
