On 06/08/2011 12:02 PM, Michael Chapman wrote:
I can't find any indicative performance (bandwidth)
figures for Jacktrip ... so ask for the experience of
others.
On a standard CAT-5 cable between two adjacent
machines I can get four (mono) channels at 48 KHz,
but trying to set channels>4 just results in a (very
silent) failure to connect.
Back of an envelope calculations of audio flux
against 100 Mb/s (say 10 MB/s) suggest more
should be possible.
absolutely. i have used jacktrip with 24 channels in the past. the
problem used to be that if your redundancy setting is too high, you will
hit the maximum udp packet size, at which point jacktrip used to barf
(but that's 2+ yrs ago).
there is a google group for jacktrip:
http://groups.google.com/group/jacktrip-users?hl=en
the ccrma guys hang out there, so that's your best bet for support.
alternatively, check out netjack, it works better than jacktrip in that
it doesn't cheat with synchronization. but it's also a lot more hairy to
set up.
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487
Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio)
Tonmeister (VDT)
http://stackingdwarves.net
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
