On 24 Aug 2011, at 17:00, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:28:38 -0000
> From: Richard Lee <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Questions regarding a very early 'Ambisonic'
>       LP
> To: 'Surround Sound discussion group' <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <01CC621F.0240EF60@edgexp>
> 
>> Peter also mentions the Meridian software decoder, which is not 
> available. However there are plenty of software decoders available for 
> download.
> 
> Duu.uuh!  Mr. Elen, could you please provide some links to these.  I've 
> already checked the Unobtainium Software website for software UHJ decoders.
> 
> BTW, though I suggest a way to distinguish between RM & UHJ/45J, I agree 
> with the gurus who suggest it is probably 45J.
> 
> A UHJ decoder will decode Matrix H nicely.  

I disagree, unless you mean press the stereo button (or the mute button). 
Matrix H was designed to be decodable via a modified QS decoder.

Nothing decodes matrix H well and, as such, nothing is the best thing to use.

> If you can tweak it to 45J, 
> even better.
> 
> The "phase amplitude pan locus" for Matrix H is discontinuous but not as 
> badly as the seriously wonky SQ.  45J was designed to be inside the Matrix 
> H spec and would probably give "better" results than "dedicated" Matrix H 
> decoddrs.  

45J was designed entirely without reference to matrix H!!!!!
say three hail MAGs for the blasphemy.

> IIRC, apart from the ve...ry early experiments, the BBC used 45J 

not so. They only changed from matrix H into the 'compromise' HJ. An HJ decoder 
was designed to be made entirely from political, rather than electronic, 
components and, as such, was entirely non-causal and was as accurate as you 
imagined it might be.

> and UHJ decoders for all their work.

HJ was compatible with UHJ at maybe four locations. One of them was not RAH. 

However, the only HJ encoders around for b-format encoding got UHJ 
compatibleised by a backend re-design by me.


> 
> GV Malham, is Howard Smith still around?  

sadly, no.

Geoffrey

> I don't think he made the move to 
> AMS.
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110824/9ab28f3c/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to