Sampo Syreeni <decoy@...> writes: > > On 2011-09-01, Newmedia@... wrote: > > > Sure but, as you know, acoustic analysis has long worked in the 40-50 > > dB SNR territory, whereas for "audio" (i.e. playback of recorded > > performances) we have gotten used to 80-100 dB -- two very different > > domains. > > But also do note that they're doing cross-modal analysis and active > beamforming based on that. So in theory they might well get into the > audio range, at least with distant point-like sources, such as speech. > That sort of "active decoding" appears to be their main aim as well. > > There are very interesting parallels to this in fMRI research, where > they try to correlate MRI sequences and/or change-highlighting MRI > stills (very high dimensional imaging data) to functional stimuli. I > only recently became aware of this to-be modern classic ( > http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/09/fmrisalmon/ ), but that's a > highly nontrivial problem in statistical correction techniques, and > rather interesting if really applied to spatial AV as well.
We read with interest the discussion of our audio camera product on Sursound. We are lurkers, but have not had much time to participate We are getting ready to launch our new web site which will answer the questions that have been raised here, where we will share all the specification questions that have been raised. We will announce the site here when it is ready. Let me just say that our specs meet or exceed the specs of the high end devices that have been mentioned on this thread. See you all at AES Booth 758, or on the new website. Cheers and Happy Listening, Adam O'Donovan _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list [email protected] https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
