thanks for the info Simon ! are you using these setups for wavefield synthesis or another application ?
On 29 March 2012 17:00, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send Sursound mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Sursound digest..." > > > When replying, please remember to edit your Subject line to that of the > original message you are replying to, so it is more specific than "Re: > Contents of Sirsound-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: 32-channel capture (Simon Edmonds) > 2. Re: Sursound Digest, Vol 44, Issue 22 (Jascha Narveson) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:37:51 +0100 > From: Simon Edmonds <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] 32-channel capture > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I've been looking at options for doing this in for my MA work and I am > now using the following two systems: > > 1. One M-Audio Profire Lightbridge with four Behringer ADA8000 to give > 32 analogue outputs > 2. Two Focusrite Saffire Pro 40s with two Behringer ADA8000 to give 36 > analogue outputs > > The former is more economical than the latter when the Lightbridge is > bought on eBay for ?177 ;-) > The latter was economical due to having a trade account with Focusrite! > > Both are being driven by Max/MSP from Mac and PC and are working fine > > For channel counts above 32 - I would look seriously at what can be done > using audio over ethernet solutions such as Dante and Ravenna. Costs per > channel look ok for the Focusrite RedNet kit and the Merging > Technologies Horus is worth checking out. > > > Simon Edmonds > > **** <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:53:25 -0400 > From: Jascha Narveson <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 44, Issue 22 > To: [email protected], Surround Sound discussion group > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > right! bolt, not bird. maybe Thunderbird's the next OS... > > > > On Mar 28, 2012, at 3:35 AM, <[email protected]> < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> ...or you could wait for people to start making Thunderbird-enabled > audio interfaces? They'd be plenty fast, though you'd be back to buying > apple... > > > > I think you mean Thunderbolt ;} - and the rumour is that it will be > coming to Asus and Sony PCs in April, so you may be able to avoid filling > Apple's coffers. > > > > Chris Woolf > > _______________________________________________ > > Sursound mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > > > End of Sursound Digest, Vol 44, Issue 24 > **************************************** > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120329/ef4d614d/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list [email protected] https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
