The 2011 paper by Nachbar, et al, "ambiX - A Suggested Ambisonics Format", specifies SN3D as the normalization scheme. (see eqn 3 in section 2.1, "The normalization that seems most agreeable is SN3D...")
The papers are here http://ambisonics.iem.at/proceedings-of-the-ambisonics-symposium-2011 -- Aaron Heller (hel...@ai.sri.com) Menlo Park, CA US On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Michael Chapman <s...@mchapman.com> wrote: > >>> >>>> Unless of course they publish a file format for it.... >>> >>> Want a minimal and purposely highly (even overtly) extensible one? That >>> I can design. In fact I've meant to do something like this from teenage >>> up. :) >> >> Please do! >> > > A group of us proposed a CAF based file format at Graz (in 2009) > <http://mchapman.com/amb/reprints/AFF.pdf> > It had a mixed response ;-)> > > It has though been taken forward and a further proposal was > made at the US Ambisonics symposium by Christian Nachbar (Graz) > and colleagues. (N3D instead of SN3D, being one major change.) > > Time has brought greater agreement and stability. > > As I wasn't at York, and as the Graz folks are on this List, I > won't give a reference as it would probably be out-of-date, > anyway. > > So problem solved .... > > Michael > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
