Absolutely!
Dave
On 19 February 2013 12:49, Fons Adriaensen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:54:25AM +0000, Dave Malham wrote:
>
>> The trouble with Angelo's kit is that it's not really "hi-fi".
>> Works well for what it was designed for (noise pollution research) but
>> not really good enough for serious audio.
>
> It was primarily designed to find the direction of arrival of sounds,
> which is something entirely different from reproduction.
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
> A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
> It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
> and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
--
As of 1st October 2012, I have retired from the University, so this
disclaimer is redundant....
These are my own views and may or may not be shared by my employer
Dave Malham
Ex-Music Research Centre
Department of Music
The University of York
Heslington
York YO10 5DD
UK
'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
