I, too, find it really odd that a facility that was there in the very
earliest production Soundfields (and which I used as a matter of course
every time I used them) is no longer there in this model even tho' it would
cost less to add it now than back in the 70's. Still, it IS about the only
thing that there is wrong with it :-)
Dave
On 20 March 2014 12:57, Jon Honeyball <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Pity this *still* doesn¹t have a 1K tone generator at say -20dB, allowing
> you to properly calibrate the input levels and replay of your recorder,
> which almost certainly doesn¹t have ganged controls. The Sounddevices 788T
> can do this, but others can¹t. Missed opportunity.
>
> Jon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>
--
As of 1st October 2012, I have retired from the University.
These are my own views and may or may not be shared by the University
Dave Malham
Honorary Fellow, Department of Music
The University of York
York YO10 5DD
UK
'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20140330/46904f66/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
