Dave Malham wrote:

Anyone noticed the fact that Barco Auro 3-d has purchased Isosono. Could be
interesting.

http://www.barco.com/en/News/Press-releases/Barco-gains-the-team-and-expertise-from-IOSONO-GmbH-to-f.
..

   Dave


I didn't notice yet, and many thanks!

Here a complete link (link above is broken):

http://www.barco.com/en/News/Press-releases/Barco-gains-the-team-and-expertise-from-IOSONO-GmbH-to-further-enhance-the-immersive-sound-experienc.aspx


Founded in Erfurt, Germany, in 2004, IOSONO quickly became the technology leader in 3D audio. The company specializes in object-based sound rendering in various professional applications, including cinema, by incorporating distance data which takes the simple panning of sound around a three-dimensional space to the next level.


To reproduce distance data is not as straightforward in Auro-3D (or Dolby Atmos) as in a WFS system. Nevertheless, there are methods to include at least some distance cues. (We had some discussions here.)


Galaxy Studios is renowned worldwide for its state-of-the-art leadership in audio innovation for music and sound for film.


I agree that Auro-3D looks like a convincing discrete format for music recordings. (And which is already used for music recordings.)

You can see Auro-3D as a 5.1/7.1 format extension < with height >. Backward compatibility to "film/surround standard audio" ITU5.1/7.1 is kind of built-in, therefore. (The format looks arguably "light"/economic if compared to 22.2 as supposed standard configuration for UHD TV. Of course they will be able to < reduce > 22.2 to other configurations, but this also implies they will have to support some format changes - probably employing rendering via VBAP.)

http://www.linkwitzlab.com/Links/AURO3D_Theile-Wittek_Dec_2011.pdf


Best,

Stefan

P.S.: Another question would be if 22.2 would perform better than Auro-3D in listening tests. (In practical terms, 22.2 recording would be a lot more difficult to record. See Theile-Wittek paper...)

P.S. 2: Dave, it is Auro-3D or Auro 3D... Don't want to seem too pedantic, but this is the way they spell it. ;-)


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20140928/007544af/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to