On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 07:29:48AM +0100, Dave Malham wrote:

> Sounds interesting! I think I'll leave a member of the BLaH gang and/or
> Fons to answer the calibration question, but as for the name, since it's a
> bunch of shotguns bunched together, how about 'Gat" as in short for Gatling
> 
> On 13 April 2015 at 16:23, umashankar manthravadi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > I am planning to do an experiment and want some suggestions.
> > I plan to build an eight channel microphone using short shotgun capsules
> > they should be considered 2nd order directivity) I can design an octahedral
> > frame to support them. overall it  will make a 12 cm radius sphere, but the
> > capsules will be on a 20-25 mm radius sphere. I can easily design to drive
> > an eight channel a to d like the 8 pre.
> > how should I go about calibrating the microphone? the eight A-format
> > signals can be decoded to first order with height plus 2nd order
> > horizontal, I guess.

To get full 2nd order you need 9 channels. It may be possible to get
2nd order horizontal (at the expense of vertical) by biasing the
directions towards horizontal rather than using a perfect octaheder.

But I see a more serious problem. Shotgun mics work by integrating
pressure over their lenght. That means that the effective radius
(the one that determines phase/time differences between capsule
signals) will be around half the physical one. And that is rather
large, it means that any linear A/B matrixing will start to break
down around 2 kHz.

Anyway, how to calibrate such a thing and get the best out of it
is difficult to say without first studying a set of measurements.

Ciao,



-- 
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to