Hi Steven,

* Steven Boardman <[email protected]> [2015-07-10 07:50]:
> Hi Peter
> 
> Thanks very much, it makes for a good read.
> 
> I intend to position the mics in platonic solid positions to help encoding, 
> via laser guide/theodolite if possible. My intension is capturing the 
> acoustic, rather than determining source position, so the quality of sound 
> will be more important than accuracy of direction. Phase problems are 
> probably the biggest concern, and why I will need to make sure I know the 
> exact position of the mics relative to a central one. 
Yes, there is a quite strong holographic error for capsule position deviations 
at
low frequencies, as simulated in this thesis (p. 49):
http://plessas.mur.at/rnd/da/Thesis_Plessas.pdf

> I intend to have synced sample accuracy for each mic, and will use tetramics, 
> so am hopeful there will be less error than the Octavas they used.
In the paper I refered to used the researchers use a separate wireless
sync signal to distribute word clock to all mics.

See this paper as well:
http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2014/video.php?id=13
which claims a sample accuracy of ~20microseconds.
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to