There's a IETF proposal from folks at Google for "Ambisonics in an Ogg Opus
Container", based on

  Nachbar, et al., Ambix - A Suggested Ambisonics Format. 3rd International
Symposium on Ambisonics and Spherical Acoustics, Lexington, KY (2011)

and the idea of a default stereo decode from Etienne Deleflie's Universal
Ambisonic work



   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07

Martin Leese has posted pointers to it here from time to time. Early
versions had errors, which I informed them of and were fixed in later
versions.


Aaron Heller (hel...@ai.sri.com)
Menlo Park, CA



On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Stefan Schreiber <st...@mail.telepac.pt>
wrote:
>
> Short comments (to text below):
> (1)
>
> The ambisonics input channels can’t be coded in some 7.1 (channel
coupling, LFE) style, agreed.
>
> With opus you seem to need channel mapping #255, not #1 - the latter
 corresponds to (classical) 2D surround sound layouts.
>
> (2) I believe that  FB is already using up to 11 channels coded with
opus, although I am not absolutely sure about. (Could say more about this
in a few weeks, hopefully.)
>
> (3) Multi-channel != (classical) 5.1/7.1 surround sound.  In fact
surround sound is not a synonym for 5.1/7.1.
>
> We are on the surround list, so should know about this!
>
> But now we are getting slightly confused: Xipg.org’s Opus or Flac don’t
have to care about Dolby Digital or DD+ 5.1/7.1, right? So maybe you mean
5.1/7.1 channel mapping?
>
> To claim that 5.1 is “Dolby” doesn’t make sense. (There is an official
ITU layout standard, and many versions implemented/defined by DTS, Mpeg,
Sony and “anybody else”.)
>
>
https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/bs/R-REC-BS.775-3-201208-I!!PDF-E.pdf
>
> So (righteously) you can implement 5.1 and 7.1 audio tracks since
Vorbis...
>
> (4) A lossless compression format could be used for mastering. I meant
this.
>
> Best,
>
> Stefan
>
> - - - - - - -
>
> Citando Marc Lavallée <m...@hacklava.net>:
>
>> Le 2018-07-29 à 05:56 PM, Stefan Schreiber a écrit :
>>
>>> 1. I believe that the opus encoders/decoders have always supported more
than 8 channels.
>>
>>
>> Correct, but when encoding 8 or less channels, correlation is applied in
ways that are incompatible with Ambisonics; for example, the LFE channel is
filtered... With more than 8 channels, Opus don't correlate channels, but
it does now if the input stream is Ambisonics (and if the Ambisonics mode,
disabled by default, is compiled in).
>>
>>> 2. The next question is what ogg channel mapping and consequently
real-world browsers allow...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  But in some sense the hack you did is known. (More complicated is
maybe to make it work...)
>>
>>
>> I tried only with 4 channels. It worked. I don't know if browsers are
now capable to support more than 8 channels. If the Octomic is getting
popular with VR content producers, maybe browsers will start supporting
streams with more than 8 channels (without systematically down-mixing them
to stereo).
>>
>>> 3. If they already plan to issue some ogg ambisonics standard (using
ogg opus of course) since at least 2016: You also need an associated
mastering standard, which would not change or compress any audio data.
Correct?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  So what is “political” about extending the channel count of FLAC?
>>
>>
>> Multi-channel still mean Dolby 5.1 or 7.1. There's an inertia because
"standards" were designed as vendor lock-ins.
>>
>>> Compromise proposal:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  4. So let’s maybe use .wav or .caf for the “mastering format”.
Microsoft and Apple already allow more than 8 channels...
>>
>>
>> Sure. Lossy codecs are not suited for mastering.
>>
>>> P.S.: “Joint stereo” you could classify as parametric coding.
>>
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Marc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180729/c6f73626/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to