Has anyone done a calibration of a RØDE NT-SF1 and compared the RØDE
A-to-B format conversion with the conventional matrix and calibration
filter A-to-B format conversion - including the effect of a moving mic
or sound source? Anyone willing to take it on? The results could be very
interesting.
Gerard Lardner
On 17/12/2018 09:39, Dave Hunt wrote:
Hi,
There is slightly more description of their A to B-format processing
(but not much) in Rode's blog:
<http://www.rode.com/blog/all/soundfield-plugin>
>From that web page.
"The SoundField by RØDE plug-in uses a new time-frequency adaptive approach for A to
B-format conversion. This complex mathematical process means the phase between the
A-format channels are aligned prior to application of the conversion matrix – essentially
correcting for the non-coincidence of the capsules prior to any further processing."
How might they phase/time align the capsules ??
This must indeed be highly complex, as it is frequency dependent (low
frequencies have smaller phase differences than high frequencies) as well as
source directionally (across multiple blind sources) dependent.
Ciao,
Dave Hunt
On 16 Dec 2018, at 17:00,[email protected] wrote:
Send Sursound mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Sursound digest..."
WHEN REPLYING EDIT THE SUBJECT LINE
ALSO EDIT THE MESSAGE BODY
You are receiving the digest so when replying, please remember to edit your Subject line
to that of the original message you are replying to, so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Sursound-list digest…" the subject should match the post you
are replying to.
Also, please EDIT the quoted post so that it is not the entire digest, but just
the post you are replying to - this will keep the archive useful and not
polluted with extraneous posts.
This is the responsibility of digest subscribers. the community and list
subscribers care about the integrity of the threads and archives so this is
important.Today's Topics:
1. Re: Soundfield by Rode plugin (Gary Gallagher)
From: Gary Gallagher<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Soundfield by Rode plugin
Date: 16 December 2018 04:36:11 GMT
To: Surround Sound discussion group<[email protected]>
Thanks for that reference. I guess we'll just have to wait for more
information to filter out.
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018, 01:36 Paul Hodges<[email protected]> wrote:
There is slightly more description of their A to B-format processing
(but not much) in Rode's blog:
<http://www.rode.com/blog/all/soundfield-plugin>
Paul
--
Paul Hodges
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
edit account or options, view archives and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20181216/6396613f/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
WHEN REPLYING EDIT THE SUBJECT LINE
ALSO EDIT THE MESSAGE BODY
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20181217/0679dbcd/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
