The audacity on this mailing list is incredible. I am not only referring to the last respondent. Questions and discussions could be nice and fruitful. But why not some humility and decency?!
On 2021-12-07, 21:19, "Sursound on behalf of Sampo Syreeni" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > I don’t actually think that there are any special requirements. I think there are. And you know, I think you came to the right place: we might even be able to tell you where you're wrong, where you're right, and help you measure and quantify what your product is really about. Sursounders really like products of your kind to hit the market. They're just the *thingy*, in our beloved technology. It's just that we like to know what they're about, and how to make them the best they can be. 8) Right, well the shown work is not a product. Therefore, you're welcome to work with or on the method yourself. Recent publications on the work are out there. Also, code was made available to allow for direct reproducibility. @Sampo So actually, all the interesting questions you're demanding to be answered, you could investigate them yourself and report the results! (Also: SMA here refers to spherical microphone array) Kind regards, /Hannes _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list [email protected] https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
