It booted. And it even shown the year 2001 in the date. But you cant
use Date to set "correct" year anymore (anything less then 80).
BTW: out of an intrest i've also checked MS-DOS 7. You wouldnt believe
it, but it got the same problem. Seems like Microsoft didnt made
our beloved Windows 95 so Y2K compatible after all. I think i'll give
them a call. Last time they said its ok since MS-DOS 6.22 is obselete.
I wander how this little fact about MS-DOS 7 is going to make them
reply this time.
Or Botton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Truth is stranger than fiction, because fiction has to make sense."
-----------------------------
http://members.xoom.com/dsdp/
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
- [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Guti
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Peter Torrano
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Travis Siegel
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K P o p
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Ben Hood
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Gunnar Thoele
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Shoop
- [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Steven Darnold
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Eko Priono
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Ben A L Jemmett
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Charles Dye
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Ben A L Jemmett
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Anonymous
- Re: [SURVPC] MS-DOS and Y2K Anonymous
