> Or Botton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >It was about the idea of taking out the multi-tasking compoment
> >of Windows 95 and somehow attempt to implement it as an external
> >and non-windows95 requiring program/driver.
> >
> >Possible?
>
> At least a part of it should be possible, I suppose. (g)
> There is a program which can turn off the GUI part of Windows 3.xx.
> The archivename is VMTD.ZIP. The programmer says it would be possible to
> adapt it for W95, too. Sources in C and ASM are included.

Thats intresting, I think i'll look for it.

However, I was more talking on the direction of COMPLETLY moving
the multi-tasker compoment from Windows 95 to DOS. That is, to
be able to run the multi-tasker - without running Windows 95 itself.
And i'm not talking just about the GUI, I am talking about the
entire Windows program, all but what is required for the multi-tasker,
but this allowing it to be a sort of a device that can be loaded in
CONFIG.SYS or as an COM/EXE program.

Possible?

                                       Or Botton
                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- "Truth is stranger than fiction, because fiction has to make sense."
-----------------------------
http://members.xoom.com/dsdp/

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.

Reply via email to