I hope this is an item of interest to SURVPC subscribers.

>>--------- Begin forwarded message ----------
>>Interesting reading:
>>
>>
>> http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit19990902.html
>>
>> Robert Cringley:  Tactics Versus Strategy - Why Microsoft and Intel
>> Both Lost Ground This Week to the Open Source Movement
>>--------- End forwarded message ----------

I was going to just post some excerpts, but I couldn't decide what to
delete, so here it all is. No need to visit the URL, except to check
out some of the authors other articles. I hope this is not too much
for the list. Please advise if this is so and I will be more
judicious in the future.

Regards,
Dale Mentzer
--------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Cringely: The Pulpit
Arachne 1.50
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/                  Sat, 04 Sep 1999
21:05:26
______________________________________________________________________

Tactics Versus Strategy Why Microsoft and Intel Both Lost Ground
              This Week to the Open Source Movement

By Robert X. Cringely

        Never fight a land war in Asia. Never
        invade Russia in the fall. Whenever
        possible avoid wars on two fronts.
        Alexander, Hitler, Napoleon and George
        McNamara all learned various combinations
        of these lessons of engagement, but
        Microsoft apparently hasn't, having fallen
        a bit further behind this week to the Open
        Source Liberation Army. And in a very
        peculiar way, Microsoft's countermeasures can't help,
        but make life harder for an old friend -- Intel.

        Some of the news was obvious, some subtle. The obvious
        part was Sun Microsystems' purchase of Star Office, an
        application suite that runs on a variety of platforms,
        but mainly on Linux. Star Office, while simpler
        than Microsoft Office has the advantages of being, well,
        simpler than Microsoft Office. And of course, the
        price is right. But Office source code, which should result
        in a thousand upgrades blooming -- each one another headache
        for Microsoft.

        To make things worse for Redmond, Sun plans a Web-based
        version of Star Office that will allow the cheesiest little
        Java Web browser to run a sophisticated office
        application, even without local storage.
        Spreadsheets on your TV set top box are only
        months away. And most important of all, Sun cut a deal with
        the gurus at Linuxcare to support both developers and
        users. This puts Microsoft at both a price and platform
        disadvantage and virtually guarantees we'll soon see
        server-based office applications on WebTV. The Linuxcare
        wildcard also adds high-quality tech support, which is the
        thing big business has worried about when considering
        free operating systems. Lots of outfits are turning to
        Linuxcare, which is the only Linux startup so far funded by
        the smartypantses at Kleiner Perkins Cufield and
        Byers. Buy a Dell computer with Linux installed? Dell's
        Linux support is really Linuxcare.
        Part of Sun's strategy in buying Star is to put pressure
        on Microsoft and boost server sales. The rest of
        the strategy is to revive Sun's comatose
        JavaStation network computers. Have you ever
        known a JavaStation user? Me neither. Whatever the
        motivation, it's a smart move on Sun's part - -
        especially open-sourcing the code, which will give
        Microsoft fits and cost Sun absolutely nothing. In a
        completely unrelated but equally important event, Microsoft
        decided to stop development work on the 64-bit
        version of Windows 2000 for Compaq's (formerly Digital's)
        mighty Alpha processor. Probably Windows 2000,
        which has been delayed several times already and stands to
        be delayed once again, was just too hard to get
        running on two 64-bit fronts at the same time -- those
        fronts being Alpha and Intel's new, and
        equally-delayed, Merced processor. In fact, it is easy
        to see the Microsoft move as a love poem to Intel,
        though that's not at all its intention or reality.
        Windows 2000 is a monstrous product that Microsoft will
        shortly delay again with claims that it is just better to
        wait until after the Y2K dust settles. Killing the Alpha
        version just reduces the Win2000 monstrosity level a bit - -
        for Microsoft, not for us. So what happens to the
        Alpha? Compaq will still be using the chips in their Tandem
        Himalaya servers. Samsung is also designing Alpha
        motherboards that fit PC models. What's more, the AMD
        Athlon chip runs on the Alpha EV6 processor bus, allowing
        the potential reappearance of Alphas in mass-market CPU
        boards. But what operating system will nearly all of these
        Compaq and third party machines be running? Thanks
        to Microsoft this week, nearly all of them will run
        Linux. Compaq engineers quietly admit that Linux on Alpha
        runs better than Compaq's own Unix. So don't be surprised
        if Compaq kills its True64 Unix product in favor of Linux.
        Compared to free, it is hard to justify the True64 RaD
        investment, especially given the Titanic mindset inside
        Compaq these days. Or
        maybe Compaq will save the best parts of True64 and put
        them on Linux, which is similar to the survival
        strategy being embraced right now by SGI. With Windows NT
        being dropped by Microsoft from the Alpha, this frees
        Compaq from any contractual arrangements with
        Redmond, allowing for a free push into Linux. And even if
        Compaq is just too overwhelmed with panic and
        downsizing to fully embrace Linux, every other Alpha
        vendor has almost no other choice. So Microsoft,
        choosing Merced over Alpha, has helped push away one of its
        biggest allies -- Compaq -- actually hurting Intel in
        the process. Not that many of us will be running either
        Alpha or Merced machines on our desktops anytime soon.
        These chips will instead be running in servers
        supporting all those new server-based applications
        like Star Office. Is a pattern beginning to emerge here?
        But wait, there's more! Let's look beneath the
        announcements and their immediate implications to the
        larger picture of where open source software is headed and
        what it means to users. I believe Microsoft is
        threatened not only in the server space, but at every level
        of computing.

        Bill Gates once told me that the way to make money in
        the computer business is by setting de facto standards, by
        which he meant proprietary standards. Microsoft has done
        just this, first with its languages, then with DOS,
        Windows, and with Office. Microsoft makes incredible
        profits this way, even in a market with decreasing prices.
        But the same thing isn't happening on the
        Internet, where Microsoft, for all its muscle, doesn't
        dominate and where there are few proprietary standards.
        Microsoft missed the Internet and has been
        playing catch- up for years. Bill Gates can't take
        credit for any of the current Internet boom. Then why is
        it happening? This time it is because of open
        standards, not de facto ones, with the most important
        standard being the Internet protocols themselves like
        TCP/IP and HTML. Look at TCP/IP or HTML, and you'll see
        that the very reasons for their success are the
        opposite of Microsoft's. Both are open standards that nobody
        owns, that follow published specifications
        (Microsoft hides major parts of its product specs), that
        require no license fees, and that have freely-available
        reference implementations. THIS is what made the Internet
        boom possible, and Linux -- as well as a number of other
        open source operating systems -- has exactly the same
        characteristics.

        The future of personal computing is clearly to be found in
        low-cost machines. You can get a free PC today by
        cutting an Internet service deal, but two years from now
        you'll be able to buy a real PC for under $100
        and even the Internet service will be free.
        Making machines that cheap will drive them into
        all levels of society doing things we never expected. To
        appeal to the broadest range of users, the operating
        systems of these cheap machines will have to be hidden
        behind simple user interfaces yet to be designed. There is
        no way Microsoft can make and support a powerful operating
        system that runs on a $100 device. In contrast, a
        free operating system -- ANY free operating system -- can be
        economically deployed on a $100 platform today. That's the
        power of free, leaving no place for Microsoft on the user
        end.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


    This mail written by a user of Arachne, the DOS Internet Client
                WWWWW World Wide Web Without Windows
          http://home.arachne.cz Arachne DOS Browser Home Page

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.

Reply via email to