This picture is actually pretty good - click on the thumbnail picture
to get a large picture.
I have seen a NeXT in use - even played around a little on it. What
you see in the picture was largely what you got, except for very
sloowwww performance as the screen was rendered. IIRC, it used
PostScript for everything, including drawing the screen. As you can
imagine, this slowed down screen redraw tremendously. On the
other hand, what you saw was almost always exactly what you got
when you printed on the laser printer (also a black cube) that you
could purchase with the NeXT.
Anthony J. Albert
On 18 Oct 99, at 23:14, John Teffer wrote:
> "James P. Hahn" wrote:
> >
> > Here is the picture that I have of the NeXT Cube. It isn't very good but it
> > is what I've got.
> >
> > http://members.xoom.com/jphahn/NXcube.gif
>
> Here's another site with general info and another not-so-great photo;
>
> http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~alexios/MACHINE-ROOM/NeXT_Cube.html
>
> What the world needs is more $6500 die cast magnesium cubes. :)
>
> - John
>
> --
> "If only the world was inflatable, opaque, and crunchy." - Dronon Brassmane
> --
>
==============================================================
Anthony J. Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems and Software Support Specialist Postmaster
Computer Services - University of Maine, Presque Isle
Attention: the next meeting of the Time Travellers' Society
will be last Tuesday.
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
