At 10:50 AM 11/28/1999 +0000, pippi wrote:

>  This is a bread+butter operation for Linux.  For TCP/IP
>  networks, it takes just two ifconfig commands and
>  couple of route commands.
>
>  Cheers,
>  Steven

>  If I do stumble on a
>  command to edit something I can't get out of the editor except by manual
>  reboot.

Try the Pico editor. It is pretty simple and it explains the commands at
the bottom of the screen.

>  Why hasn't someone written a guide that compares linux for M$
>  users??

Actually, such a book would be pretty easy to write, since basic
file system commands are quite similar, for instance:

                           DOS          Unix (most shells)
list files and directories dir          ls  (list)
rename file                rename       mv
move a file                move         mv
copy a file                copy         cp
delete a file              del          rm  (remove)
change directory           cd           cd
find text in a file        find         grep  (get regular expression)
sort lines of file         sort         sort
print a file               print        lpr  (line printer)
display file 1 page at a
time                       more         more
display contents of file   type         cat  (contatenate)


I good readable book on Unix, which also applies to Linux is:
        Introducing the Unix System, Henry, McGilton and Rachel Morgan,
        McGraw-Hill, 1983

>  I have study linux in 24 hours but cannot
>  carry out basic lessons because  -----
>  I've seen this in a few
>  manuals, neglecting basic instructions such as how to find a directory, how
>  to open/close applications and files, how to install/remove applications
>  and files, etc.  If DOS instructions were this arcane everyone would have
>  to use Macs!

I worked for Sun MicroSystems once, updating their Unix on-line ``man''
(help) pages.  User documents for Unix have traditionally assumed a
``user'' was some kind of programmer who already knew a lot about the
very operating system being described.  And Unix commands often had
undocumented features and obscurely described switches that created
Unix ``gurus'' who were valued experts on a particular command (e.g.,
sed or troff) or aspect of unix. It was historically a ``geek'' OS,
where people took great pride in discovering things that other people
did not know.

All this can be repaired with some easy by documentation targeting an
ordinary, intelligent user, and a little redoing of names, and switches -
etc. to make things more intuitive.

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.

Reply via email to