Bernie wrote:
> As you may or may not remember MS-DOS 6.x HiMem.Sys had a limit on 64MB of
> RAM. By using himem.sys from w95osr2 I was able to see all the 96MB's in
> the schools machines (so the limit is unknown).
> [...]
Weren't there some limitations with SMARTDRV etc. that caused performance to
degrade after a point? These sound like reasonably modern systems, and with
some of the buffering in modern drives, I'd be curious to see if benchmarks
showed any significant improvement with a cache that large.
Have you done any testing?
- Bob
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
