(More catchup.)
I usually make the faster machine the server (Sometimes the slower
machine won't work as a server.) YMMV, of course.
I usually use this line in config.sys for mine when using parallel
cables (4-6 times faster than serial so that's usually!):
Device=c:\Dos\Interlnk.Exe /Auto /NoPrinter
For Win9x to Dos connectivity etc., see this web page:
"Direct Connect any Windows Platform", at
http://kime.net/directcc/index.html - WONDERFUL stuff <G>
Mark
Chad Fernandez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> IBM included Interlnk and Intersvr as soon as IBM DOS 5.02, and possible
> sooner. 5.02 is my earliest experience with them. I couldn't get
> DRDOS's file transfer to work for more than a few seconds, but Intersvr
> and Interlnk seem to stay working if you can get them to work to begin
> with. I had a few troubles connecting certain computers in certain
> directions.
>
> Will Intersvr and Interlnk work under Windows 98 and a DOS/Win3.11
> machine? I tried, but wasn't successful.
>
> Chad Fernandez
> Michigan, USA
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > INTERLNK.EXE and INTERSVR.EXE
> >
> > are part of MS-DOS 6.00 and 6.22 (I believe even in MS-DOS 5.00).
> > On the master PC you can assign additional drive letters to all
> > physical disks, RAM disks and printers of the server PC. You can
> > edit files there and evenrun programs. I have been using it for
> > large file transfers from my online-capable Pentium to the
> > small survPCs in our office.
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
